Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Statistics
Posted by: Vlod Barchuk
Date/Time: 16/03/10 21:53:00

To being with George and statistics. The fact isÖ you can prove anything you like with statistics. If George wants to fixate on a single figure thatís fine but completely unhelpful. Over a decade of simplistic target setting by this Government shows that focus on apparently simple figures distorts priorities. The reason I went on about fraud is because there had been such a big recorded increase. And I did indicate that the police were going to step up their activities around car crime to deal with increased theft. And the cheapest ploy, George, is to just accuse other of using cheap ploys.

Arthur Breens wonít believe that I understand my portfolio as he long ago decided he knew better than any of the councillors what they should be doing. Not understanding who uses the police facilities to which he refers, or their public accessibility, might cause most people to think before pontificating but Arthur is made of more splenetic stuff.† 

The number and locations of police stations/offices/shops is important but only a means to an end: preventing crime and catching criminals. Ward boundaries are not relevant to most peopleís lives, (I can step outside my house and be in another ward in less than two minutes) so fixating on ward based facilities doesnít really take things forward.

An intelligent debate on crime and the role of the police and councils would be great, but this thread (for the most part) isnít it.


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
A selective truth09/03/10 14:59:00 George Knox
   Re:A selective truth10/03/10 04:23:00 Eric Alan Leach
      Re:Re:A selective truth10/03/10 10:08:00 Arthur Breens
         Re:Re:Re:A selective truth10/03/10 12:17:00 Peter Chadburn
   Statistics12/03/10 12:39:00 Vlod Barchuk
      Re:Statistics12/03/10 13:13:00 Eric Alan Leach
         Re:Re:Statistics12/03/10 13:49:00 Vlod Barchuk
            Re:Re:Re:Statistics12/03/10 13:58:00 Peter Chadburn
            A selective truth12/03/10 14:16:00 George Knox
            Re:Re:Re:Statistics12/03/10 14:50:00 Eric Alan Leach
               Re:Re:Re:Re:Statistics14/03/10 23:57:00 Arthur Breens
                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Statistics15/03/10 06:57:00 Eric Alan Leach
                     Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Statistics15/03/10 10:10:00 Alan Brainsby
                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Statistics16/03/10 21:53:00 Vlod Barchuk
                           Ok let's have the evidence17/03/10 00:21:00 George Knox
                              Re:Ok let's have the evidence18/03/10 14:58:00 Charles Gallichan
                                 Re:Re:Ok let's have the evidence18/03/10 15:22:00 Phil Taylor
                                    Re:Re:Re:Ok let's have the evidence18/03/10 22:47:00 Editor
                                 Re:Re:Ok let's have the evidence22/03/10 19:55:00 Eric Alan Leach
                                    Re:Re:Re:Ok let's have the evidence22/03/10 22:25:00 Charles Gallichan
   Re:A selective truth18/03/10 15:58:00 Tracey Beesley
      Re:Re:A selective truth18/03/10 16:42:00 Diane Gill
         Re:Re:Re:A selective truth20/03/10 15:04:00 Arthur Breens
            Councillor Vlod. Are you there please?22/03/10 22:20:00 George Knox
               Councillor Vlod. Are you snoozing?02/04/10 13:11:00 George Knox
                  Re:Councillor Vlod. Are you snoozing?03/04/10 20:31:00 Charles Gallichan
               Councillor Vlod. Are you snoozing?02/04/10 13:11:00 George Knox
                  Re:Councillor Vlod. Are you snoozing?16/04/10 11:47:00 George Knox
                  Re:Councillor Vlod. Are you snoozing?16/04/10 11:47:00 George Knox
                     Re:Re:Councillor Vlod. Are you snoozing?25/04/10 23:24:00 Arthur Breens
                        Yellow vested vigilantes11/04/11 17:41:00 George Knox
                           Re:Yellow vested vigilantes19/06/11 17:56:00 Eric Alan Leach
                              Fiddling while Rome burns19/06/11 22:45:00 George Knox

Forum Home