| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply | |
| Posted by: | N V Brooks | |
| Date/Time: | 29/06/22 12:46:00 |
| I wonder who said this, effectively meaning that the BMR lane is not needed? "it's actually safer to stay out of it there and ride on the road rather than risk being cut up by turning drivers." Step forward, Paul Richard James. In the Netherlands and in a number of German states (I only have experience of Lower Saxony, Thuringia and Bavaria) use of any dedicated cycling infrastructure is both mandated and enforced. In many cases it crosses side roads with clear signage. A few signs would doubtless be far more economical in these uncertain tiems than miles of empty dedicated paths. |