Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:CPZ ‘consultation’ | |
Posted by: | Arthur Breens | |
Date/Time: | 28/11/24 17:22:00 |
Today I received a reply from the contractor dated 27 Nov notifying me of an error...but only one of the three. They got the hours and times wrong for JJ. They however never corrected the misleading maths re visitor parking being at "no extra cost". Under their system it will cost Ł6/day and at present Ł2/day. They don't understand. A consultation is designed to sample public opinion not influemce it so words and phases like "high parking stress" and "chronic parking pressure" have no place in a consultation. Here they render it null and void. |