Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Fox attack? | |
Posted by: | Tony Price | |
Date/Time: | 08/07/10 21:52:00 |
Re What are you going to do about the dogs? xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx it is already being done, certain dogs, those most likely to attack are verbotten and any dog which does attack is automatically under potential sentence of death. Plus the fact they are, oe should be, under human control. In any event I don't see how the " toffs " comment is valid. Hardly any question of social class involvement in the foxes debate. It is not a question of ONE attack, but this one was particularly horrifying, far worse than I originally thought. By and large, dogs are watched, foxes are not, plus the attacks on domestic pets, whose safety comes first. It is incumbent on us to protect them, having taken them under our wing, as it were. And in most cases are regarded as " one of the family". |