With respect, I view the Labour Council's cutting back of basic facilities for the disabled and elderly as somewhat more important than the reduction in ranger and envirocrime numbers. We have seen the Albert Dane day centre for the disabled closed, the LINKS service for the mentally ill closed, we have seen restrictions imposed on the taxicard scheme providing vital transport for the disabled and now we are expected to pee in the Council car park. What are the ill, disabled, and elderly meant to do when visiting the council? I think we should be fighting this rather than for "nice to have" services like the rangers and the envirocrime officers. Think people not plants.

Entire Thread

Topic	Date Posted	Posted By
Park Ranger update and new petition	18/01/11 12:49:00	Jane Salisbury
Re:Park Ranger update and new petition	21/01/11 22:27:00	Rosa Popham
Re:Park Ranger update and new petition	21/01/11 23:26:00	Luther Brown
Re:Re:Park Ranger update and new petition	26/07/11 13:17:00	Jon Kennedy
Last Petition Attracted Only a Few People?	22/01/11 00:55:00	Maggie Tomlinson
A RAT GROOMING SERVICE?	22/01/11 00:58:00	Luther Brown
Re:A RAT GROOMING SERVICE?	25/01/11 15:40:00	Maggie Tomlinson
Re:Re:A RAT GROOMING SERVICE?	25/01/11 16:03:00	Jane Salisbury
Re:Re:A RAT GROOMING SERVICE?	25/01/11 16:09:00	Jane Salisbury
Re:Re:A RAT GROOMING SERVICE?	25/01/11 16:31:00	Jane Salisbury
Re:Park Ranger update and new petition	24/01/11 14:53:00	Phil Taylor
Re:Re:Park Ranger update and new petition	25/01/11 09:53:00	Jane Salisbury
Re:Park Ranger update and new petition	25/01/11 09:54:00	Jane Salisbury
Confidence in the Rangers	25/01/11 15:35:00	Maggie Tomlinson
Re:Park Ranger update and new petition	25/01/11 13:54:00	Jane Salisbury
Re:Park Ranger update and new petition	26/01/11 13:18:00	Phil Taylor
Park Ranger update	31/05/11 00:45:00	George Knox
Park Ranger cuts are good	05/06/11 08:40:00	Marc Races
Re:Park Ranger cuts are good	26/07/11 19:16:00	Chris Martin

Forum Home