Paul, You have slready stated one untruth in your post. You are mkaing a lot of assumpations. I have no case to answer to you, and after your approach to good, valuable, and reliable information, I am sure that people who follow this Forum and know you will now be chary of telling you things (if they do not already do so) because of your reductio-ad-absurdium approach. I offer valuable information, take it or leave it, a process common on review sites and the like, you do not have to read my posts, and if you are that OBSESSED by nit-pciking I would suggest that you log onto Trip Advisor and challenge EVERY SINGLE RATING for EVERY SINGLE HOTEL (which is what Trip Advisor is for, it was not intended for pubs which are a minor and ancillary aspect of its research), when you have finished asking everyone in the world why they gave a place the rating they did and chased them up repeatedly no doubt you will be feeling much better and Trip Advisor will be a better place. In the meant-time I expect more of you inductive questioning and I ask that other readers of this Forum not fall into your trap of assuming that something that you say which is not contradicted is therefore right, a classic mistake when an inductive interviewing technique is misused. It is usually a good idea to start with what has been said if you want to get a realistic picture, rather than what you would like to have been said, or you think has been said, or you would like to have been said |