Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply
Posted by: Raymond Havelock
Date/Time: 05/03/22 09:08:00

If you look at the terms and conditions of carriage on TFL services ( which I did a few years back & it's like a telephone directory) One has to remember that your fare is also a form of insurance.
If you work and carry professional tools - even a laptop or bespoke software but more likely trade or professional equipment then it is unlikely that it is permitted in any London Transport service but particularly on services that use tunnels , so the tube underground and Elizabeth Line.

Of course many who are carrying either prohibited items in their very long list do as they are out of sight and very portable.

Only when something happens does this become apparent. You either have no right to claim or can be held fully liable if your item causes injury or delay. You own business PLI won't cover you because you have breached the T&Cs of carriage.

If you run a vehicle, car or van or bike you have to have PLI as well as mandatory insurance, and this normally covers passengers.

But while Mayor and his pals want to choke small businesses and self employed out of London and force people onto the public transport, the TfL T&Cs have remained unchanged. In fact from terrorism, much has been increased.

But like the mask wearing fiasco with no proper enforcement, this is also an area where there is little enforcement if any.

That is until you have something happen and you find you are not insured or covered as you were travelling in breach of the T&Cs.

TfL and the Mayors office repeatedly refuse to address this or how this is supposed to accommodate those they wish to force out of vehicles.

In current times this reckless approach is going to plunge hundreds of thousands below the poverty line and into unviable business.


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Government Demands Driverless Trains and More Active Travel28/02/22 17:13:00 Paul Richard James
   Re:Government Demands Driverless Trains and More Active Travel28/02/22 17:26:00 N V Brooks
      Re:Re:Government Demands Driverless Trains and More Active Travel28/02/22 18:52:00 Terry Freestone
   Re:Government Demands Driverless Trains and More Active Travel28/02/22 17:43:00 Peter Yale
      Re:Re:Government Demands Driverless Trains and More Active Travel28/02/22 19:07:00 Simon Hayes
         Re:Re:Re:Government Demands Driverless Trains and More Active Travel01/03/22 09:04:00 Raymond Havelock
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Government Demands Driverless Trains and More Active Travel01/03/22 09:26:00 Colin Goodman
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Government Demands Driverless Trains and More Active Travel01/03/22 10:50:00 Simon Hayes
               Reply03/03/22 11:20:00 Christine Mulligan
                  Re:Reply03/03/22 11:35:00 Simon Hayes
                     Re:Re:Reply03/03/22 14:18:00 Bettina Margaret Thwaite
                        Re:Re:Re:Reply03/03/22 14:30:00 Simon Hayes
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply04/03/22 17:36:00 Philippa Bond
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply05/03/22 09:08:00 Raymond Havelock
                              Re:  The London Plan06/03/22 11:17:00 Philippa Bond
                                 Re:Re:  The London Plan06/03/22 11:46:00 N V Brooks
                                 Re:Re:  The London Plan06/03/22 11:55:00 Raymond Havelock
                                    Re:Re:Re:  The London Plan06/03/22 16:56:00 Philippa Bond

Forum Home