Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Government Demands Driverless Trains and More Active Travel
Posted by: Simon Hayes
Date/Time: 28/02/22 19:07:00

I had quite a lot of dealings with TfL when the jubilee line upgrade was progressing (slowly) a decade or so ago. There was a lot of bleating then by drivers about safety issues, although loss of well paid jobs with perks was probably the main cause of discontent.

Khan has been lucky that he’s not had firebrand former RMT boss Bob Crow to deal with, otherwise the number of strike days would be far higher. Bob was very militant and seemed to have a strong support base in the union.

The signalling systems on the upgraded lines will allow more frequent services with all the trains linked to eliminate human error, including going through a red signal. The main issue when upgrading is the disconnect between technologies which causes multiple shorting of signals, bringing whole lines to a halt. It was the bane of the jubilee line for years until compatibility was achieved.

If you’ve ever been in a tube train cab, as I have, you will know that visibility in tunnels is virtually nil and reaction times are severely limited when travelling at speed. Better signalling and modern trains will improve safety if correctly installed. However there ought to be more station staff at all times, simply to improve the ‘customer experience’.

But going back to the latest bailout. Why are cycling and walking always lumped together as active travel. Everyone walks to some extent, and you don’t need special equipment to do it. Maybe if some of the £50m was spent on improving pavements it would encourage far more people to walk further. Cycling isn’t the answer, and never has Ben.


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
Government Demands Driverless Trains and More Active Travel28/02/22 17:13:00 Paul Richard James
   Re:Government Demands Driverless Trains and More Active Travel28/02/22 17:26:00 N V Brooks
      Re:Re:Government Demands Driverless Trains and More Active Travel28/02/22 18:52:00 Terry Freestone
   Re:Government Demands Driverless Trains and More Active Travel28/02/22 17:43:00 Peter Yale
      Re:Re:Government Demands Driverless Trains and More Active Travel28/02/22 19:07:00 Simon Hayes
         Re:Re:Re:Government Demands Driverless Trains and More Active Travel01/03/22 09:04:00 Raymond Havelock
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Government Demands Driverless Trains and More Active Travel01/03/22 09:26:00 Colin Goodman
            Re:Re:Re:Re:Government Demands Driverless Trains and More Active Travel01/03/22 10:50:00 Simon Hayes
               Reply03/03/22 11:20:00 Christine Mulligan
                  Re:Reply03/03/22 11:35:00 Simon Hayes
                     Re:Re:Reply03/03/22 14:18:00 Bettina Margaret Thwaite
                        Re:Re:Re:Reply03/03/22 14:30:00 Simon Hayes
                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply04/03/22 17:36:00 Philippa Bond
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply05/03/22 09:08:00 Raymond Havelock
                              Re:  The London Plan06/03/22 11:17:00 Philippa Bond
                                 Re:Re:  The London Plan06/03/22 11:46:00 N V Brooks
                                 Re:Re:  The London Plan06/03/22 11:55:00 Raymond Havelock
                                    Re:Re:Re:  The London Plan06/03/22 16:56:00 Philippa Bond

Forum Home