Topic: | Re:Re:Please keep at it Mr Farmer! 👍 | |
Posted by: | Raymond Havelock | |
Date/Time: | 03/08/22 08:19:00 |
As you say, I generalised and Mr Evans has a point. There are things in place that should and ought to be enough. However, if that too is corrupted by systemic failings and influences and fails to act on findings or procrastinates deliberately on findings and actions then that too is a serious disservice to the taxpaying public. Unfortunately this is pretty evident to the point that making a complaint be it small or large is a arduous, costly and time consuming procedure and made so to deflect complaints. For ordinary citizens it's a bit like making a planning objection. The grounds for the objection may well be valid and more often than not borne out to be 100% vindicated post build. But you have to be able to be fluent in plannerspeak and with all their rules and regulations, most of which are impenetrable to make a simple point. High level complaints are the same and all too often that process loses touch entirely with the initial point of the complaint. Which leads me to the conclusion that what is in place is not satisfactory and is being used in a way that is not intended |