Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:LTN49 - anyone have any news? | |
Posted by: | Paul Richard James | |
Date/Time: | 30/11/21 10:49:00 |
>PC Khan James, you are anti car (except for the one you use as & when) I'm not anti car. I'm anti too many car journeys and too many cars. >You don’t want them down your road as you had to approach drivers!! Eh? >You want LTNs to stop vehicular travel, which the public voted against & I proved to you cause congestion & consequently pollution. Again and again you're shown to be mistaken here. >You want lanes wiped out purely for cyclists We're not going to get anywhere without dedicated and separate cycle tracks along main roads. >won’t hear a bad word against them. "them"? That's very prejudicial. I won't hear a word against drivers as a group either, or pedestrians. I cycle, walk and drive. It's about individuals. Sure you can identify some common behaviours based on the form of transport, but using that to hammer a group is out and out prejudice. >So yes, I would suggest you don’t want vehicles at all Utter tripe. |