Topic: | Re:Re:Reply | |
Posted by: | Andrew Farmer | |
Date/Time: | 18/09/20 11:29:00 |
Mr Southwell, Thank you for your contribution to my thread. 1. You write: “Of course he [Bell] would have known about the issues with Nasjarek as they would have been disclosed as a matter of course during the selection process.” What evidence do you have that that happened? Speculation is worthless if unsupported by evidence. Your speculation assumes the appointment was made honestly. The point of my question to Bell (and Sabiers) was to investigate whether it was. The evidence is that Najsarek had taken legal action to prevent his record at Bolton being made public and it was still in place at the time he was appointed and for several months after. 2. If you believe that Bell knew Najserak’s record when he was appointed and it had all unfolded “as a matter of course” and there was nothing to hide, are you not surprised that Bell did not simply answer “yes” to my question? 3. You say that Bell was being evasive “because the questioner has the appearance of being a bit unbalanced”. This would only make sense if that is what Bell thought AT THE TIME. How do you know what Mr Bell thought when he received my email two months ago? (In fact, privately far longer than that.) You don’t. And it doesn’t make sense. This is something YOU are saying now, a foolish insult picked up from Andy Jones. You have lowered yourself to his level. 4. It would only be fair to let you explain yourself. You have the email that I sent to Bell. Please analyse it and demonstrate why anyone would think the person who wrote it was unbalanced? 5. You say the question was not “tricky”. The point of it was to pin Bell down. If he said “Yes. I knew all about Mr Najserak’s record at Bolton”, he would reveal that he had grossly misled the people of Ealing when he sang his praises as a public servant. If he said “No”, he would reveal that Najserak had successfully practised deceit to gain his job. Thank you again for your contribution. I hope you will take this piece of advice: study the facts of the matter you are discussing and examine what you have written before you publish it. |