| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Danny Baker | |
| Posted by: | Tony Heath | |
| Date/Time: | 10/05/19 13:54:00 |
| Nigel, thank you for your measured response (previous post), the contents of which I'm in broad agreement. >>NVB wrote>> "the ramifications of this (Danny Baker Tweet) mistake are only as a result of some very poor judgement by Danny Baker in the first place." 'Very poor judgement of Danny Baker'. In hindsight, yes. But my opinion of him has risen considerably. What a lovely guy he must be in his heart, for him to innocently Tweet a photo of content that he was totally unaware could be interpreted very negatively by those who indeed have 'poisoned minds'. All is pure to the pure in heart. |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Danny Baker | 10/05/19 09:42:00 | Tricia Arbuthnot |
| Re:Danny Baker | 10/05/19 12:30:00 | Peter Chadburn |
| Re:Danny Baker | 10/05/19 12:47:00 | N V Brooks |
| Re:Re:Danny Baker | 10/05/19 12:51:00 | Peter Chadburn |
| Re:Re:Danny Baker | 10/05/19 14:59:00 | Simon Wycombe |
| Re:Danny Baker | 10/05/19 12:53:00 | Tony Heath |
| Re:Re:Danny Baker | 10/05/19 13:19:00 | N V Brooks |
| Re:Re:Re:Danny Baker | 10/05/19 13:54:00 | Tony Heath |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Danny Baker | 10/05/19 14:01:00 | Susan Kelly |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Danny Baker | 10/05/19 14:15:00 | Keith Iddon |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Danny Baker | 10/05/19 14:33:00 | N V Brooks |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Danny Baker | 10/05/19 15:08:00 | Tony Heath |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Danny Baker | 10/05/19 17:08:00 | Susan Kelly |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Danny Baker | 10/05/19 17:15:00 | N V Brooks |
| Re:Danny Baker | 21/05/19 10:22:00 | Andrew Farmer |