| Topic: | Re:Re:Gurnell Swimming Pool | |
| Posted by: | David Marshall | |
| Date/Time: | 25/06/24 10:17:00 |
| Yes, it looks uninsurable. There are additional questions – unanswered by the developer – about dangers to structural stability and the desirability of allowing millions of gallons of water to flood the foundations of a high-rise building. And then there is the question of water contamination. If (when) it all floods, water entering the car park will become contaminated by oil and particulate residues – all of which will eventually end up back in the River Brent. A huge amount of accumulated filth. Plus, I quite liked this bit (in the planning application): “Internal doors… will be watertight flood gates and will be closed on reception of a flood warning from the EA.” Let’s hope they check no one’s still down there when they lock the doors. |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Gurnell Swimming Pool | 20/06/24 12:55:00 | Eric Alan Leach |
| Re:Gurnell Swimming Pool | 25/06/24 09:38:00 | Mark Evans |
| Re:Re:Gurnell Swimming Pool | 25/06/24 10:17:00 | David Marshall |
| Re:Re:Re:Gurnell Swimming Pool | 05/09/24 00:46:00 | Anthony Hawran |
| Re:Gurnell Swimming Pool | 05/10/24 10:06:00 | Eric Alan Leach |
| Re:Re:Gurnell Swimming Pool | 05/10/24 15:19:00 | Phil Kay |
| Re:Re:Gurnell Swimming Pool | 09/10/24 09:11:00 | Peter Yale |