thank you Andrew , the logic of the court escapes me , small claims are supposed to be places for small claims and should by their very nature be simple and low cost , the idea that the council can claim as you say that an absence of a law is somehow a law . that is a nonsense there may be no law that says they must respond but that cannot be used as if it was a law that they must not respond the mere absence of a law is in effect a nothing . it does not make any sense , there are bilions of things that have no laws and many laws that exist that are redundant in practice the councils argument was in essence specious and I strongly suspect that the judge who tried my case is a freemason and they have an oath to always help fellow freemasons which means that in effect i would not be able to obtain justice , i emailed the editorial team at this site and hope I can bring this case to the attention of media because mark my words if they can ignore me they can ignore ANYONE

Entire Thread

Topic	Date Posted	Posted By
Ealing Council awarded £1600 costs against me	09/12/21 11:12:00	P Taylor
Re:Ealing Council awarded £1600 costs against me	09/12/21 12:16:00	Andy Jones
Re:Re:Ealing Council awarded £1600 costs against me	09/12/21 12:24:00	P Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Ealing Council awarded £1600 costs against me	09/12/21 12:34:00	Simon Hayes
Re:Re:Re:Re:Ealing Council awarded £1600 costs against me	09/12/21 13:00:00	P Taylor
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Ealing Council awarded £1600 costs against me	09/12/21 13:07:00	Simon Hayes
Re:Ealing Council awarded £1600 costs against me	09/12/21 21:55:00	Andrew Farmer
Re:Re:Ealing Council awarded £1600 costs against me	09/12/21 22:39:00	P Taylor

Forum Home