Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Ealing Council awarded £1600 costs against me | |
Posted by: | P Taylor | |
Date/Time: | 09/12/21 13:00:00 |
the SAR request was considered inadmissable , anyway the councils skeleton argument was that there was nothing in law that compels them to respond , this argument means essentially that all of us can be ignored at any time by Ealing Council regardless of what we are communicating about, in my case I required urgent assistance with a rogue landlord who had been featured in media reports see ' Investing Solutions' meanwhile Ealing Council claim to treat residents with respect and you can see their charter on their website , Unfortunately I think the Judge was a freemason . its never been more obvious that the law is not designed to help the average individual |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
Ealing Council awarded £1600 costs against me | 09/12/21 11:12:00 | P Taylor |
Re:Ealing Council awarded £1600 costs against me | 09/12/21 12:16:00 | Andy Jones |
Re:Re:Ealing Council awarded £1600 costs against me | 09/12/21 12:24:00 | P Taylor |
Re:Re:Re:Ealing Council awarded £1600 costs against me | 09/12/21 12:34:00 | Simon Hayes |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Ealing Council awarded £1600 costs against me | 09/12/21 13:00:00 | P Taylor |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Ealing Council awarded £1600 costs against me | 09/12/21 13:07:00 | Simon Hayes |
Re:Ealing Council awarded £1600 costs against me | 09/12/21 21:55:00 | Andrew Farmer |
Re:Re:Ealing Council awarded £1600 costs against me | 09/12/21 22:39:00 | P Taylor |