| Topic: | Reply | |
| Posted by: | Paul James | |
| Date/Time: | 20/10/26 15:11:00 |
>Don't like change for change sake. It's not change for change's sake though, no doubt there were some serious issues with the old site as it was very old technology, which often has security flaws and is very hard or impossible to maintain and keep running. It's only gone from late 90s tech to early 2000's tech but still. |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Anyone else... | 18/10/26 14:26:00 | Keith Iddon |
| Reply | 18/10/26 14:26:00 | Keith Iddon |
| Reply | 18/10/26 15:20:00 | Rosco White |
| Reply | 18/10/26 17:13:00 | N V Brooks |
| Reply | 18/10/26 19:06:00 | Peter Tolhust |
| Reply | 19/10/26 08:44:00 | Gordon Southwell |
| Reply | 19/10/26 15:11:00 | Keith Iddon |
| Reply | 19/10/26 15:44:00 | Gordon Southwell |
| Reply | 19/10/26 17:04:00 | Simon Hayes |
| Reply | 20/10/26 09:00:00 | Mark Evans |
| Reply | 20/10/26 14:26:00 | Eric Alan Leach |
| Reply | 20/10/26 14:48:00 | Rosco White |
| Reply | 20/10/26 14:52:00 | Keith Iddon |
| Reply | 20/10/26 15:38:00 | Mark Evans |
| Reply | 20/10/26 15:11:00 | Paul James |