| Topic: | Reply | |
| Posted by: | Gordon Southwell | |
| Date/Time: | 30/10/25 09:12:00 |
A quick post script. As most will probably have seen the development was approved despite the high level of objections. The decision was unanimous which suggests a strong case was made for it. I completely understand why people living in the area were against it but I don't think that it will prove to be a major blight. |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Mount Close development | 05/08/25 15:09:00 | Elizabeth Howard |
| Re:Mount Close development | 05/08/25 16:12:00 | Peter Yale |
| Re:Re:Mount Close development | 05/08/25 19:54:00 | Rosco White |
| Reply | 06/08/25 08:48:00 | Gordon Southwell |
| Re:Reply | 06/08/25 10:32:00 | Rosco White |
| Re:Reply | 06/08/25 10:32:00 | Bill Trenchard |
| Re:Re:Reply | 06/08/25 13:58:00 | Elizabeth Howard |
| Re:Re:Reply | 06/08/25 14:02:00 | Paul James |
| Reply | 06/08/25 15:04:00 | Gordon Southwell |
| Re:Reply | 06/08/25 16:02:00 | Peter Yale |
| Re:Re:Reply | 06/08/25 16:23:00 | Mark Evans |
| Re:Re:Re:Reply | 06/08/25 16:52:00 | Simon Hayes |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply | 06/08/25 17:15:00 | Elizabeth Howard |
| Reply | 07/08/25 08:18:00 | Gordon Southwell |
| Reply | 30/10/25 09:12:00 | Gordon Southwell |
| Re:Reply | 30/10/25 10:54:00 | Peter Tolhust |