| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Mindless vandalism in Lammas Park | |
| Posted by: | Colin Goodman | |
| Date/Time: | 24/06/25 18:00:00 |
| I've not added any caveats at all. You gave the straight forward answer and I'm fine with you having that opinion. I will disagree with your preference for B as it means the loss of valuable public amenity space and, IMHO, really bad for the environment and overall health and welfare of the local community. Digressing slightly but....... I live a stones throw from Lammas Park but far enough away that these works won't directly effect my house value, the use of my garden etc. It does however mean myself and, yes thousands of, other people have lost a few acres of OUR land to use and enjoy. My house has never flooded save for the road gulley that has been blocked for 3 years and the fact that our local sewer is basically trollied and clearly running over capacity at times of high rainfall. The road and pavement ends up with a huge puddle but such is life. Now my house COULD flood but I'd say for that to happen I'd also see a fella called Noah busy in his back garden with a load of lumber and pairs of animals as far as the eyes can see. So my position will always be the opposite to yours as I've lost something for the sake of gaining zero. Finally I have no issue with not being classy but have a word with yourself... I applauded you for giving a straight answer as not many would. I've not edited or changed the question. Hopefully you're not that mortally wounded by it all to make it to the Red Cross Field Hospital -- keeping fighting the fight you warrior you! |