Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply
Posted by: Andrew Farmer
Date/Time: 19/05/20 16:32:00

A few points

1.  Your defence of Shah.  The words originated in an Owen Jones spoof.  However, the words are what the words are.  The point is Shah TOOK THEM SERIOUSLY and LIKED THEM.    She then “unliked” them.  I suggest that was because she realised, she had again given away something nasty in her character – and, oh dear, no longer had the authority or manly arm of Owen to support her.

She already had “form”.  She had retweeted antisemitic memes.   “Just really unfortunate”, thought Rupa Huq.  No. Just really antisemitic.  She later posted a tribute to Winnie Mandela with a “meme”:  "Together, hand in hand, with our matches and our necklaces, we shall liberate this country." The necklaces were tyres.  The matches were to set them alight around people’s necks.  This was excused as an accident.

Ms Shah seems prone to accidents that reveal the unsavoury content of her mind.
 
2.  Her background.  One would have thought that that might have made her more sympathetic to girls who had suffered far worse abuse.
   
3.  You write: The case of the girl who was confronted by her abuser has nothing to do with free speech but is down to failures in Police and Home Office.   I agree.   I did not say that, however.  My reference to the incident was in the second part of my post which dealt with Starmer’s front bench, not the first part that dealt with free speech.

4.  As to “LGBT”, it bundles together different categories of people. Its job-lot approach is offensive to some of those denoted by the individual letters.   They may not wish to be identified with this collective and its agenda.   They may not wish to play the identity game at all and be identified as homosexual or lesbian as though that was the only significant thing about them. In my experience, most transsexuals are happy to have had their dilemma resolved by surgery and just want to get on with their lives.   It is transactivists who stir up hostility and provoke ridicule.
  
5. “LGBT” was latterly tagged on, along with much else, to the original politically motivated proposal for the Council to adopt the definition of Islamophobia, handed down from on high, actually Southall, by Councillor Mason. The purpose of this widening of the proposal was to disguise what this is really about, which is what the definition of Islamophobia is really about - supressing discussion of Islam.  


Entire Thread
TopicDate PostedPosted By
SALUTE A LOCAL HERO03/05/20 11:05:00 Andrew Farmer
   Re:SALUTE A LOCAL HERO03/05/20 11:53:00 Peter Chadburn
      Re:Re:SALUTE A LOCAL HERO03/05/20 12:51:00 Philippa Bond
         Reply03/05/20 18:58:00 N V Brooks
            Re:Reply04/05/20 00:05:00 Ben Owen
               Re:Re:Reply to Ben04/05/20 15:26:00 Keith Iddon
                  Re:Re:Re:Reply to Ben05/05/20 10:42:00 Andrew Farmer
   Re:SALUTE A LOCAL HERO04/05/20 13:56:00 Susan Kelly
      Re:Re:SALUTE A LOCAL HERO04/05/20 14:16:00 Rosco White
         Re:Re:Re:SALUTE A LOCAL HERO04/05/20 14:24:00 Peter Chadburn
         Re:Re:Re:SALUTE A LOCAL HERO04/05/20 19:23:00 Susan Kelly
            Re:Re:Re:Re:SALUTE A LOCAL HERO04/05/20 20:33:00 Rosco White
   Reply05/05/20 11:29:00 N V Brooks
      Re:Reply05/05/20 13:46:00 Andrew Farmer
         Reply05/05/20 19:53:00 N V Brooks
            Re:Reply06/05/20 16:07:00 Andrew Farmer
               Re:Re:Reply06/05/20 19:03:00 Peter Chadburn
                  Re:Re:Re:Reply08/05/20 16:21:00 Andrew Farmer
               Reply06/05/20 19:25:00 N V Brooks
                  Re:Reply10/05/20 12:32:00 Andrew Farmer
                     Re:Re:Reply10/05/20 15:59:00 Keith Iddon
                        Reply10/05/20 17:52:00 N V Brooks
                           Re:Reply10/05/20 19:01:00 Keith Iddon
                              Re:Re:Reply11/05/20 18:18:00 vincent paul wrigley
                                 Re:Re:Re:Reply11/05/20 19:51:00 Keith Iddon
                                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply14/05/20 09:02:00 Andrew Farmer
                                       Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply14/05/20 10:25:00 Keith Iddon
                                          Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply14/05/20 12:36:00 Bettina Margaret Thwaite
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply15/05/20 07:16:00 Philippa Bond
                                                Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply15/05/20 16:28:00 Andrew Farmer
                                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply18/05/20 13:26:00 Andrew Farmer
                                                      Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply18/05/20 14:14:00 Peter Chadburn
                                                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply19/05/20 10:54:00 Philippa Bond
                                                            Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply23/05/20 10:50:00 Andrew Farmer
                                                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Reply19/05/20 16:32:00 Andrew Farmer

Forum Home