| Topic: | Re:Roche test | |
| Posted by: | Peter Evans | |
| Date/Time: | 16/05/20 14:45:00 |
| I can see the value of an after-the-event antibody test for scientific and statistical research, but what would be the social consequences of individuals knowing their result? Assuming it does indicate some level of ongoing immunity, would those tested positive no longer be bound by the restrictions and have the run of the place? Would they have to carry a certificate to prove it? Could they go to 'immunes only' restaurants, while the rest of us press our potentially virulent noses to the window? |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Roche test | 14/05/20 07:11:00 | Nicholas Beard |
| Re:Roche test | 14/05/20 07:44:00 | Nicholas Beard |
| Re:Re:Roche test | 14/05/20 16:03:00 | Mark Julian Raymond |
| Re:Re:Re:Roche test | 15/05/20 07:08:00 | Philippa Bond |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Roche test | 15/05/20 17:08:00 | Nicholas Beard |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Roche test | 16/05/20 08:48:00 | Susan Kelly |
| Re:Re:Re:Roche test | 15/05/20 18:15:00 | Nicholas Beard |
| The price of an antigen test | 20/05/20 23:42:00 | Mark Julian Raymond |
| Correction:The price of an ANTIBODY test | 21/05/20 03:27:00 | Mark Julian Raymond |
| Re:Roche test | 16/05/20 14:45:00 | Peter Evans |
| Re:Re:Roche test | 16/05/20 15:00:00 | Nicholas Beard |
| Re:Re:Re:Roche test | 21/05/20 08:30:00 | Susan Kelly |